Sam Bankman-Fried’s Appeal Rejected
Sam Bankman-Fried’s bid to overturn his fraud and conspiracy conviction has failed. A Second Circuit Court of Appeals panel ruled Friday that the former FTX CEO’s arguments that his trial was unfair did not hold up under scrutiny. The decision marks another legal setback for the once-prominent crypto executive whose empire collapsed in spectacular fashion in late 2022.
The three-judge panel rejected Bankman-Fried’s core contentions that he was prevented from presenting all his legal arguments and that he should have been allowed to argue FTX’s investments would eventually appreciate in value. The court found Judge Lewis Kaplan, who oversaw the original trial, made no errors in his handling of objections or evidentiary rulings.
“Bankman-Fried makes these arguments in the face of a trial at which the government’s evidence against him was, conservatively stated, robust,” the ruling stated. The panel’s decision aligns with the skeptical reception Bankman-Fried’s legal team received during oral arguments last November, when judges repeatedly interrupted and questioned his attorney Alexandra Shapiro.
One of Bankman-Fried’s key arguments centered on his claim that the misappropriated customer funds were invested in assets that would eventually grow in value. He suggested this intent to repay customers should have negated fraud charges. The appeals court firmly rejected this reasoning, noting that the wire fraud statute explicitly encompasses temporary misappropriation regardless of eventual repayment intentions.
See also: Robinhood Closes $180M WonderFi Acquisition to Enter Canadian Crypto Market
“Whether the assets purchased by Bankman-Fried appreciated in value is irrelevant as to whether he committed fraud,” the ruling said. The panel emphasized that the law does not distinguish between permanent and temporary theft when fraud is involved.
Bankman-Fried’s legal team also argued that FTX operated as a margin futures trading platform where customers should have expected temporary loss of access to their funds. This argument too fell flat with the court. The panel noted that while some FTX customers opted into margin trading, others did not, and crucially, no customer consented to having their money transferred under false pretenses to Alameda Research, the trading firm Bankman-Fried controlled.
“We are unpersuaded,” the court wrote. “The fact that some FTX customers opted into margin trading, and thus temporary deprivation of their money, is beside the point. Some opted into margin trading, some did not. No one opted into having their money transferred under false pretenses to Alameda.”
The appeals court’s affirmation of Judge Kaplan’s trial management represents a significant hurdle for Bankman-Fried’s legal strategy. The panel explicitly supported the judge’s discretionary decisions throughout the proceedings, giving little opening for future appeals on procedural grounds. This follows a pattern seen in related regulatory and legal developments in crypto where courts have taken increasingly firm stances on fraud allegations.
Despite this appellate loss, Bankman-Fried continues pursuing other legal remedies. He is separately seeking a new trial in federal court, a motion that faces an uphill battle given the appellate panel’s confidence in the original proceedings. Earlier this week, Bankman-Fried formally requested a pardon from U.S. President Donald Trump, though Trump previously indicated he was not considering such action for the former FTX executive.
The conviction carries significant prison time. Bankman-Fried was found guilty on multiple counts including wire fraud on customers and lenders, conspiracy, and money laundering. Prosecutors alleged he orchestrated a scheme to misappropriate billions in customer funds from FTX to prop up Alameda Research and fund lavish personal spending.
The collapse of FTX in November 2022 sent shockwaves through the crypto industry, according to Cointelegraph and other major outlets covering the scandal. The exchange’s implosion wiped out billions in customer assets and triggered a broader crisis of confidence in centralized crypto platforms. Bankman-Fried’s subsequent arrest, trial, and conviction became a defining moment in crypto’s regulatory reckoning.
With his appeal exhausted and pardon prospects dim, Bankman-Fried faces limited options to overturn his conviction. The new trial motion represents his most viable remaining path, though courts rarely grant such motions absent compelling new evidence or procedural violations. The appellate decision suggests the judiciary views the original trial as fundamentally sound.
If you’re reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there, by joining the…
Discover more from Dipprofit
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
