Coinbase Executive Backs CLARITY Act Delay Despite Industry Frustration

A senior Coinbase executive is defending the slow progress of crypto-specific legislation in Congress, saying the complexities of digital asset regulation justify why the CLARITY Act hasn’t become law while simpler bills like the GENIUS Act sailed through. The comments come as the industry grows increasingly impatient with Washington’s glacial pace on crypto policy.

The executive, whose specific title wasn’t disclosed in public statements, drew a direct comparison between the two pieces of legislation to explain why one passed and the other remains stalled. According to the Coinbase representative, the GENIUS Act addressed “structurally simpler” regulatory questions than the comprehensive framework proposed in the CLARITY Act.

“I completely understand the delay”, the executive stated, pushing back against mounting criticism from crypto advocates who view Congressional inaction as either incompetence or deliberate obstruction.

See also: Breaking : Bitwise Expresses Confidence In Ethereum ETF

Why One Bill Passed While Crypto’s Hope Remains Stuck

The GENIUS Act, which did make it through Congress and into law, dealt with narrower technical issues that didn’t require lawmakers to rethink decades of securities regulation fundamentally. That’s the crux of why it moved faster than comprehensive crypto legislation.

CLARITY Act proponents have been waiting for over a year since the bill was introduced. The legislation aims to establish clear rules distinguishing which digital assets qualify as securities and which don’t; a question that’s haunted the industry since the SEC started enforcement actions against exchanges, token issuers, and DeFi protocols.

Coinbase’s public defense of Congressional foot-dragging represents a notable shift in tone from an exchange that’s spent millions on lobbying and legal battles with regulators. Either the company is genuinely satisfied with behind-the-scenes progress, or it’s playing nice with lawmakers it needs to court. Both could be true.

The executive’s framing suggests Coinbase sees the delay as a feature rather than a bug. Complex legislation that gets rushed often includes loopholes, contradictions, or provisions that create more problems than they solve. Financial services regulation has a long history of unintended consequences from hastily written laws.

What’s Actually Holding Up Crypto Legislation

Several factors explain why the CLARITY Act remains in limbo while simpler bills advance. First, the legislation forces Congress to take a clear position on what crypto actually is: a commodity, a security, or something entirely new. That’s politically risky when regulators themselves can’t agree.

Second, traditional financial institutions have mixed incentives. Banks want into crypto markets, but they also don’t want nimble crypto-native competitors operating under lighter regulatory frameworks. Their lobbying dollars pull in opposite directions.

Gary Gensler’s SEC has maintained that existing securities laws already provide all the clarity needed, rendering the CLARITY Act unnecessary in the agency’s view. That position gives political cover to lawmakers who’d rather not vote on controversial crypto bills before the next election cycle.

Coinbase itself faces an ongoing lawsuit from the SEC over alleged unregistered securities offerings. The company’s stake in this legislation couldn’t be higher—favorable laws could effectively end that litigation or at least shift the legal landscape in the exchange’s favor.

See also: Bitcoin Is Good for US Dollar, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong Says

Regulatory uncertainty continues to depress US crypto innovation relative to jurisdictions with clearer frameworks. Developers and projects are being incorporated in Singapore, Dubai, and Switzerland rather than Delaware. That matters because it means tax revenue, high-paying jobs, and technological development happening elsewhere.

The executive’s comments might also signal that Coinbase expects movement on the CLARITY Act within a specific timeframe, though no concrete deadlines were mentioned. Companies typically defend delays when they believe resolution is approaching, not when they’ve given up hope.

Whether the CLARITY Act eventually passes in its current form, gets watered down into something toothless, or dies in committee will determine if US exchanges can compete globally. Coinbase’s willingness to publicly defend the delay suggests the company believes patient diplomacy serves its interests better than aggressive criticism right now. Time will tell if that calculation pays off or if competitors in friendlier jurisdictions eat their lunch while Washington dithers.