A growing exodus of Bitcoin miners toward artificial intelligence data centers has sparked heated debate over whether the shift threatens the Bitcoin network’s security and long-term viability as a store of value.
Crypto trader Ran Neuner warned on Sunday that Bitcoin could face existential risks if AI continues pulling miners away from the network. “AI has killed Bitcoin forever,” Neuner said, arguing that artificial intelligence has become Bitcoin mining’s biggest competitor because both industries compete for the same electricity resources.
The economics driving the shift are stark. Bitcoin mining revenue per megawatt ranges from $57 to $129, while AI data center revenue for the same electricity reaches $200 to $500 — up to eight times higher, according to Neuner.
Major mining companies have already begun pivoting operations. Core Scientific secured up to $1 billion in credit for AI hosting earlier this month. MARA Holdings recently filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, signaling its intent to sell some of its Bitcoin as part of an AI pivot.
Hut 8 signed a $7 billion AI infrastructure agreement with Google in December, while Cipher Mining cut its hashrate to focus on AI compute. Bitmain co-founder Jihan Wu has stopped mining Bitcoin entirely and pivoted to AI, Neuner noted.
“So if I were a miner, it wouldn’t be a tough decision. And that’s why every day more and more miners are leaving the network,” Neuner said.
See also: Bitcoin Dips 3% Then Rebounds as Iran War Erupts; Crypto Markets Show Resilience
Bitcoin’s hashrate has dropped 14.5% since its October peak, raising concerns about network security. Neuner argued that fewer miners securing the network increases the potential for 51% attacks, where a malicious actor could gain control of the majority of mining power.
However, not everyone shares Neuner’s dire outlook. Bitcoin pioneer and cryptographer Adam Back argued that difficulty adjustments would simply force out the least efficient miners while improving profitability for those who remain.
“What happens to Bitcoin is simple: tick tock, next block! Difficult adjusts downwards, the least efficient and AI switchers move out, and Bitcoin mining profitability converges to AI profitability,” Back said.
Investor Fred Krueger echoed this sentiment, stating: “If AI outbids miners for electricity, miners just turn off until the difficulty adjusts and it’s profitable again, that’s literally how Bitcoin works.”
Neuner countered that while automatic network difficulty adjustments have compensated for hashrate declines during previous bear markets, “this time is different because we don’t have the energy.”
Bitcoin mining profitability, measured by hashprice, is currently near an all-time low, according to data from HashRateIndex.
Bitcoin ESG specialist Daniel Batten offered a contrasting perspective, arguing that “the evidence tells us that AI is dependent upon Bitcoin for its expansion” rather than the other way around.
Batten explained that Bitcoin mining can utilize stranded energy sources, act as a flexible load balancer for energy grids, and employ older equipment that runs on cheaper energy, some advantages that AI data centers don’t necessarily share.
Neuner also suggested that Bitcoin’s fate may ultimately depend on price action. “What I hope is that Bitcoin has one green candle. Maybe because of the war, maybe because of the regulation, who knows?” he said.
He argued that rising Bitcoin prices could make mining profitable enough to prevent a mass exodus to AI. “If you’re watching the Bitcoin price action during this war, that’s exactly what’s happening,” Neuner added.
The alternative scenario, where Bitcoin prices continue falling, represents “pretty much a Bitcoin doomsday,” according to Neuner.
Bitcoin has experienced five consecutive monthly red candles, a streak not seen since the 2018 bear market. However, March is currently tracking positive with Bitcoin gaining 8% so far this month, according to CoinGlass data.
The debate highlights a fundamental tension in the cryptocurrency mining industry as emerging technologies compete for limited energy resources. While Bitcoin’s built-in difficulty adjustment mechanism is designed to maintain network stability regardless of hashrate fluctuations, the unprecedented pull of AI economics presents a new variable that the ecosystem hasn’t faced before.
Whether Bitcoin’s self-regulating mechanisms will prove sufficient to weather the AI competition, or whether Neuner’s concerns about network security prove prescient, remains to be seen as the situation continues to develop.
If you’re reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there, by joining the…
Dipprofit’s private Telegram community
Discover more from Dipprofit
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
